EU COVID‑19
Vaccine Contracts

Table of Contents

What the Documents Establish

The following are established beyond reasonable dispute by primary source documentation. No claim beyond the evidence is made.

• The procurement was personally directed by Von der Leyen via private text messages with Pfizer CEO Bourla. Those messages have been deleted or declared lost. The EU General Court found this explanation implausible. The EPPO is investigating for destruction of evidence, corruption, and conflict of interest.
• Von der Leyen was installed as Commission President through a backroom deal engineered by Macron — a former Rothschild banker whose first major deal was for Pfizer, described by the FT as Rothschild's protégé.
• Rothschild & Co published their own investor interview with Pfizer on their own website in April 2021 — during the peak procurement period. Self-generated evidence of proximity.
• Von der Leyen's husband became Medical Director of a pharma company receiving EU funding in September 2020 — the same month EU procurement strategy was being finalised. Not disclosed.
• Both contracts transferred all liability to Member States and citizens, while companies retained full IP ownership substantially funded by public money.
• Every Member State government signed documents acknowledging long-term effects were unknown — while communicating the opposite to citizens.
• Within 90 days of rollout, Pfizer had identified 1,291 adverse event categories of special interest. The FDA was asked to suppress this data for 75 years.
• The EMA confirmed in writing to MEPs that the vaccines were not authorised to prevent transmission — the stated justification for vaccine passports across Europe.
• Merkel blocked the TRIPS IP waiver throughout 2021 — protecting the same monopolies guaranteed in the contracts, while serving as Von der Leyen's 14-year political patron.
• The text messages that would answer who instructed whom have been destroyed.

The Documented Network

Every connection shown here is established by primary sources. No inference beyond the documented evidence is asserted.

Documented Network — EU COVID Vaccine Procurement  ·  All connections primary-source verified

The Key Individuals

Accountability Table

The Network in Detail

The individuals above did not emerge independently. They form an interlocking network of relationships — educational, professional, and institutional — that shaped both who made the decisions and why those decisions followed the pattern they did. Every element below is individually documented and uncontested.

Rothschild & Co — Self-Published Evidence of Pfizer Proximity

In April 2021 — during the peak of EU vaccine procurement — Rothschild & Co Wealth Management published on their own website an investor interview with Pfizer's Investor Relations Officer Bryan Dunn, conducted by their own equity analysts.

This is not a journalist observing the connection from outside. It is Rothschild & Co documenting their own relationship with Pfizer, on their own platform, as routine wealth management content. The openness signals confidence, not concealment — the behaviour of a network that does not consider its position problematic because the system that would hold it problematic is the same system it operates within.

The Macron–Rothschild–Pfizer Documented Chain

• Macron worked at Rothschild & Cie Banque (2008–12), rising to Managing Director in two years — unusually rapid ascent, earning approximately €3 million
• First major deal: brokering Nestlé's $11.8bn acquisition of Pfizer's baby food division (2012) — his first documented professional relationship with Pfizer
• Financial Times named him David de Rothschild's protégé in 2018; Rothschild described his presidential rise as "the planets aligning"
• Macron installed Von der Leyen as Commission President at the 2019 European Council
• Von der Leyen negotiated the EU's €35bn Pfizer contract by private text message in 2021
• Rothschild & Co simultaneously published their own investor interview with Pfizer — April 2021
• Merkel — Von der Leyen's 14-year patron — blocked the TRIPS waiver protecting Pfizer's IP monopoly throughout 2021

The Atlantic Council Ceremony — 10 November 2021

The Dual-Axis Structure

Von der Leyen is the hinge point. Both axes converge on the same corporate beneficiary: Pfizer — €35bn in contracts negotiated off the record, liability transferred to citizens, IP protected by a G7 veto, evidence subsequently destroyed.

The Family Dimension

Von der Leyen's husband Heiko became Medical Director of Orgenesis — an American biopharmaceutical company active in COVID-19 vaccine development — in September 2020, the same month EU procurement strategy was being finalised. Orgenesis subsequently received EU funding. Von der Leyen did not publicly disclose this in relation to her procurement role.

What Was Hidden and Why

The European Commission concluded Advance Purchase Agreements on behalf of all 27 participating Member States under Emergency Support Instrument (EU) 2020/521. The formal signatory was Commissioner Kyriakides. The actual negotiator, by Von der Leyen's own admission to the New York Times, was Von der Leyen herself.

Under Article 7 of the framework agreement, participating Member States agreed not to negotiate separately with the same manufacturers — locking all 27 into whatever terms the Commission had agreed.

What Was Redacted

• Price per dose and total contract value
• Advance payment amounts
• Storage and cold chain requirements
• Liability caps and indemnification terms
• Term and termination conditions
• Rights of individual Member States to opt out or renegotiate
• Amendment conditions
• Signatories on the manufacturer side

Pfizer / BioNTech Price Structure (Unredacted)

Liability Transfer

Both contracts transferred all liability for adverse events from the manufacturers to the Member States and ultimately to citizens. The companies were indemnified for any liability arising from the use and deployment of the vaccines. This provision was redacted from the publicly released versions.

Intellectual Property

Both contracts grant Pfizer and Moderna sole ownership of all IP generated during development — IP substantially funded by EU taxpayers through advance payments. This connects directly to Merkel's blocking of the TRIPS waiver, which would have permitted other manufacturers to produce vaccines using that IP without licensing restrictions.

What Was Known and When

Pfizer Post-Marketing Report (5.3.6)

Within 90 days of rollout, Pfizer had identified 1,291 adverse event categories of special interest across 42,086 case reports. This was submitted to the FDA, which sought to withhold it from public release for 75 years. Federal court orders required earlier disclosure. Member States were contractually indemnifying Pfizer against losses from these events while citizens were told the vaccines were safe without qualification.

Comirnaty Occupational Safety — OEB5 Classification

The Comirnaty occupational safety datasheet classifies the active mRNA substance at OEB5 — the highest hazard band for occupational exposure. Toxicological properties are described as "not thoroughly investigated." The datasheet requires respiratory protection, full body protective clothing, and eye protection when handling the substance.

This document was not proactively distributed to healthcare workers administering it, as required by workplace safety law. Download links from official sites were redacted. BioNTech appeared unable to locate the document promptly when requested by the German Federal Ministry of Health.

EMA Confirms: Not Authorised for Transmission Prevention

"COVID-19 vaccines have not been authorised for preventing transmission from one person to another. The authorised indication is protection of the vaccinated individual only." European Medicines Agency — Letter to MEP Marcel de Graaff et al., 18 October 2023 (EMA/451828/2023)

Transmission prevention was the stated justification for vaccine passports and access restrictions that functionally compelled vaccination across Europe without formal mandate. The EMA's written confirmation means those restrictions lacked the scientific basis on which they were publicly justified.

Compulsion Without Mandate

Formal vaccine mandates were rejected democratically in Germany — the Bundestag voted against compulsory vaccination on 7 April 2022 (primary proposal defeated 378–296). Near-equivalent compulsion was implemented by executive action through the 2G/3G access restriction system — bypassing the same parliamentary scrutiny that had defeated formal mandates.

Merkel, the Stasi, and the Sealed File

A parallel accountability problem exists regarding Merkel's past in the German Democratic Republic — following the same structural pattern as Von der Leyen's deleted text messages: the person with most to lose controls whether the evidence is seen.

Maaßen's Statement — January 2025

Hans-Georg Maaßen — former President of the Verfassungsschutz (Germany's domestic intelligence service), dismissed by Merkel — stated publicly:

"The release of Ms. Merkel's Stasi file is necessary in the interest of democracy, because citizens have a right to know whether they have been governed by a former operative of the Stasi and/or the KGB. If she had merely been a low-level employee of an administrative agency, her file would have had to be released long ago." Hans-Georg Maaßen, January 2025 — Former President, Bundesverfassungsschutz

Maaßen's statement carries particular weight: he held the highest domestic intelligence position in Germany, was dismissed by Merkel, and his phrasing implies the file should have been released automatically if it were merely an administrative victim file — suggesting he has reason to believe it is not.

The March 2026 Court Ruling

Marcel Luthe brought a lawsuit before the Berlin Administrative Court to force release of Merkel's Stasi file. On 13 March 2026, the First Chamber found that Luthe had "no legal claim to the release" under the Stasi Records Act. He was ordered to pay €20,000 in costs. The file remains sealed.

The mechanism: the Federal Archive classifies Merkel's possible file as a non-perpetrator file — triggering personal data protection provisions. Without Merkel's own consent, the file cannot be released. Merkel refuses to consent.

Documented Anomalies from Merkel's DDR Years

• Permitted to travel to West Germany multiple times without family members held as hostages — the standard DDR practice for controlling citizens with Western contacts
• Made foreign trips to the Soviet Union, Poland, and Czechoslovakia — unusual at her professional level
• At least three colleagues at her institute (Central Institute for Physical Chemistry, Academy of Sciences) were registered Inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (unofficial Stasi collaborators)
• Her later political patron Lothar de Maizière — who gave her first political role in 1990 — was subsequently identified as Stasi IM "Czerny"
• Held the position of Secretary for Agitation and Propaganda in the FDJ leadership of her institute — a role requiring ideological reliability and reporting on colleagues
• Despite documented infractions including smuggling Solidarność materials, she faced no disciplinary consequences — highly unusual in the DDR system

What Is and Is Not Established

Not proven: That Merkel was Stasi IM "Erika" or any registered informant. Historian Hubertus Knabe concluded: "There is no evidence whatsoever for the claim that Chancellor Merkel worked for the Stasi under the codename 'Erika.' If a corresponding IM file had existed, traces of it should still remain — and that is not the case based on current knowledge."

Established: Merkel enjoyed privileges in the DDR inconsistent with her official status. Her professional environment was heavily infiltrated. Her first political patron was a confirmed Stasi informant. Her file exists. She refuses to release it. The court accepted her refusal.

The Structural Pattern

In both cases, the institutional system that would compel disclosure is the same system that accepted the explanation for why disclosure cannot happen.

Corrected Source Attribution

Earlier research sessions contained a citation error: material about the Merkel/Von der Leyen relationship was incorrectly attributed to the Rothschild & Co website. That website contains only their investor interview with Pfizer. The Merkel/VdL material is sourced to Foreign Policy and France 24, corrected below.

Summary Findings

The following are established beyond reasonable dispute by the primary source record:

• Von der Leyen personally conducted vaccine procurement through private communications with Pfizer's CEO. Those communications have been destroyed or declared lost. The EU General Court found this explanation implausible.
• Von der Leyen was installed through a backroom deal engineered by Macron — a former Rothschild banker whose first major deal was for Pfizer, described as a Rothschild protégé.
• Rothschild & Co simultaneously published their own investor relationship with Pfizer on their own website — self-generated primary evidence of proximity to the corporate beneficiary of the contracts their protégé had installed the Commission President to negotiate.
• Von der Leyen's 14-year political patron Merkel simultaneously blocked the TRIPS waiver protecting pharmaceutical IP monopolies globally — the same monopolies guaranteed in the contracts.
• Von der Leyen's husband's pharmaceutical appointment was undisclosed during the procurement period.
• Both contracts transferred all liability to citizens while companies retained IP funded by public money.
• Member States explicitly acknowledged unknown long-term effects in signed contracts while telling citizens the opposite.
• Pfizer's 1,291 adverse event categories identified within 90 days were sought to be withheld for 75 years.
• The EMA confirmed in writing that vaccines were not authorised to prevent transmission — the stated justification for access restrictions used to functionally compel vaccination.
• Formal mandates were democratically rejected. Near-equivalent compulsion was implemented by executive action, bypassing the same parliamentary scrutiny.
• Merkel's Stasi file is sealed at her own request. The court system accepted her refusal to consent to release. The classified-as-victim determination cannot be verified without access to the file itself.
• No principal actor faces criminal charges. Von der Leyen was re-elected Commission President in July 2024.

⬇ Download full report as Word document (.docx) — Version 10 · May 2026